<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/5/2014 8:56 PM, Raymond Wagner
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:3A91CDD9-3E09-4410-A328-41A86EA367E2@wagnerrp.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<div>On Apr 5, 2014, at 14:46, Mike Carron <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:jmcarron@starstream.net">jmcarron@starstream.net</a>>
wrote:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font size="+1"><font face="Times New Roman">The RAID volume
is 4 2tb drives in a RAID1+0.<br>
</font></font></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div>Just the same, aside from ease of booting, there are only
disadvantages to running hardware RAID10, not to mention
unnecessarily expensive.</div>
</blockquote>
***<br>
I guess a major factor in my decision is that I already own the
drives and the controller and if they don't get used for this they
are likely to collect dust for quite a while. Your commend about
running hardware RAID10 having only disadvantages is more than a
little interesting though. Care to expand?<br>
<br>
mike<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>