<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">On Mar 17, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Mark Perkins <<a href="mailto:perkins1724@hotmail.com">perkins1724@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;">Identical and non-generic?</span></blockquote></div><br><div>I think you're off on a tangent here.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm really asking the intended behaviour of the single recording rule & hoping to catch the attention of David Engel for a Solmonic pronouncement.</div><div><br></div><div>To my mind record once is a kind of manual recording with metadata as a value added. I'm not sure why someone would go trawling through the listings for a particular showing if they then wanted the scheduler to overrule them, there are plenty of very nice search rules for that.</div><div><br></div><div>If single recording is not intended as an imperative + metadata then maybe it ought to be.</div><div><br></div><div>- George</div>
</body></html>