<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM, jedi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jedi@mishnet.org" target="_blank">jedi@mishnet.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div>On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:25:51PM -0500, Phil Bridges wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Eric Sharkey <<a href="mailto:eric@lisaneric.org" target="_blank">eric@lisaneric.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Matt S. <<a href="mailto:skd5aner@gmail.com" target="_blank">skd5aner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > > to have something on<br>
> > > in the background while you get the kids ready for school.<br>
> ><br>
> > This is a completely alien concept to me.<br>
> ><br>
> > I'm either watching TV or not watching TV. I've never understood the<br>
> > desire to have something on "in the background".<br>
> ><br>
> > As far as I'm concerned, LiveTV could easily be re-labeled "Tuner Testing".<br>
> ><br>
> > Eric<br>
><br>
><br>
> It's a good thing it's not your decision :)<br>
><br>
> It's really cool how whenever somebody has a question about LiveTV, the<br>
> "you're using it wrong" crowd comes out.<br>
<br>
</div></div> Yeah. I think that crowd goes by another name... "the developers".<br>
<br><div><div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div>If "the developers" didn't want LiveTV to be an option, perhaps "the developers" shouldn't have made that an option, eh? </div>
</div>