<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 October 2013 15:45, Karl Newman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:newmank1@asme.org" target="_blank">newmank1@asme.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Paul <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dazzle@edazzle.net" target="_blank">dazzle@edazzle.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
it is possible that your oldrecorded table (used to maintain history) has accumulated a lot of entries.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br></div>
I have cleared it out a bit and now have 267 entries in the oldrecorded table and still experiencing the same slow downs.<div><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
I believe that moving from the unsupported 0.24 to the current 0.27<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br></div>
I am, at the moment, not wishing to upgrade as I have (had?) a very stable set-up<div><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
but the Atom is a slow CPU, and I doubt you are going to be entirely happy with the scheduling times.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br></div>
I've been running this set-up for about 2 years and have never had slow down problems like this before. I compile from source and use Atom specific optimizations, plus the latest NVidia drivers have improved the performance of the ION massively.<br>
<br>
thanks for the reply and info though.<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Paul</font></span><br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>You might try tweaking your mysql tuning. In particular, increasing the temp table size made a big difference for me (but I have 8 GB memory to play with...) Take a look at the mysql tuning page: <a href="http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Tune_MySQL" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Tune_MySQL</a><span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
<br></font></span></div><span class=""><font color="#888888"><div>Karl<br></div></font></span></div></div></div>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sounds like the mysql on ext4 with barriers enabled problem, <br><br></div><div>This has been mentioned on list before personally I just reverted my OS partition to ext3 or can also be resolved with mysql tuning<br>
<br><a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1313834&page=2">http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1313834&page=2</a> or as mentioned above in the mysql tuning wiki page<br><br></div><div>Cheers,<br><br>
</div><div>Anthony<br></div></div><br></div></div>