<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Gary Buhrmaster <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com" target="_blank">gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Steve Magnani<br>
<<a href="mailto:user.serviceable@gmail.com">user.serviceable@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
....<br>
<div class="im">> I didn't know if Fedora had packaging guidelines regarding SELinux<br>
<br>
</div>The packaging guidelines allow application specific policy<br>
modules (generically, named <app>-selinux), but getting<br>
it all right requires some selinux "magic" due to the details<br>
of versioning.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, checking out the Fedora SELinux module page is interesting...</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging_Draft">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging_Draft</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>If someone wants to develop a SELinux policy for mythweb I'm willing to adopt it but I'm not enough of a selinux expert to do it.</div><div><br></div><div>Richard </div></div></div></div>