This page has some helpful information on it: <br><span style="font-family:'.HelveticaNeueUI';white-space:nowrap"><a href="http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/VDPAU">http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/VDPAU</a></span><div><font face=".HelveticaNeueUI"><span style="white-space:nowrap"><br>
</span></font></div><div><font face=".HelveticaNeueUI"><span style="white-space:nowrap">I did find that the 210 will not run advanced 1x as shown. The highest without choppiness is temporal 2x. </span></font></div><div><font face=".HelveticaNeueUI"><span style="white-space:nowrap"><br>
</span></font></div><div><font face=".HelveticaNeueUI"><span style="white-space:nowrap"><span></span><br></span></font>On Thursday, August 29, 2013, Captain Hook wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes, that sounds accurate.<div><br></div><div>Previously I meant to say I ended up with a 210 and a 650, not a 610 like I typed. <span></span><br><br>On Thursday, August 29, 2013, Stephen P. Villano wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
From my brief read, in between interruptions, the 610 was a relabel
of the 520.<br>
<br>
<div>On 8/29/13 8:42 PM, Captain Hook wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">In my quest for "Advanced 2x" deinterlacing, I
remember some reason I did not choose the 610. The 210 would only
go up to "Temporal 2x" which is still very good. I believe the 610
is some sort of rebranding of a previous model and many were not
recommending it for some reason.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>I ended up with the 610 for my quiet frontend, 650 for my
"high end" front end (runs advanced 2x with ease but major
overkill for a Linux HTPC). <span></span><br>
<br>
On Thursday, August 29, 2013, Stephen P. Villano wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hmm, 210 or
610?<br>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sparkle-PC-GeForce-Graphics-SP210L512JCPI/dp/B00ABG6Y5S/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&qid=1377812745&sr=8-15&keywords=GeForce+210" target="_blank">http://www.amazon.com/Sparkle-PC-GeForce-Graphics-SP210L512JCPI/dp/B00ABG6Y5S/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&qid=1377812745&sr=8-15&keywords=GeForce+210</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/ZOTAC-NVIDIA-GeForce-512MB-ZT-60604-10L/dp/B0083Y1YVE/ref=amtcd_B00CRY47KG_B0083Y1YVE" target="_blank">http://www.amazon.com/ZOTAC-NVIDIA-GeForce-512MB-ZT-60604-10L/dp/B0083Y1YVE/ref=amtcd_B00CRY47KG_B0083Y1YVE</a><br>
<br>
"Sparkle is a common bottom end branding here..never heard of
Jaton."<br>
<br>
Funny, I've had the converse experience here in the eastern
US.<br>
<br>
On 8/29/13 4:22 PM, Kevin Ross wrote:<br>
> On 8/29/2013 12:54 PM, HP-mini wrote:<br>
>> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 15:18 -0400, Stephen P. Villano
wrote:<br>
>>> Interestingly enough, a Sparkle GeForce 210 PCI
is $10 cheaper than the<br>
>>> Jaton ATI Radeon HD5450 512MB DDR3, not that I
ever heard of Sparkle,<br>
>>> but specs are specs.<br>
>>> Either one isn't a bank breaker, let alone a
budget breaker.<br>
>>><br>
>>> On 8/29/13 2:37 PM, Raymond Wagner wrote:<br>
>>>> On Aug 29, 2013, at 14:29, Captain Hook <<a>captainhookzero@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> I've had good luck with the GeForce 210.<br>
>>>> Note the PCI requirement. While there are
PCI versions available,<br>
>>>> they're rare and about 2-3x the price.<br>
>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>> AFAIK<br>
>> There are no PCI versions of any nVidia cards from
200 series onwards..<br>
>> I think the last PCI card was a special rare version
of 8400.<br>
>> PCIexpress is completely different to PCI.<br>
>> Most of the marketing specs just delete the most
important detail.<br>
>><br>
>> Sparkle is a common bottom end branding here..never
heard of Jaton.<br>
><br>
> Here's a Sparkle GeForce 210, sure looks like PCI to me:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187211" target="_blank">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187211</a><br>
><br>
> And fanless, too, if you like that kind of thing.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mythtv-users mailing list<br>
> <a>mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a>mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
<a>mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a>
<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank"></a></pre></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>