<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Jon Heizer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jheizer@gmail.com" target="_blank">jheizer@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">You're not running 0.27, so how could you confirm one way or another ?<br>
<div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>.26 was great for all the time I ran it and .27-pre for the last month has ran amazing as well.</div>
<div><br></div><div>/me looks out at his dead grass and wishes for more rain.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br>If it is a useful data point it IS raining here and I DON'T run 0.27, then again someone in this town may be...<br>
<br>I must put a stop to this, sick of the weather. <br></div></div>