<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div><div><br></div></div></div><div><div>Hi,</div><div> Yes I do plan to document the build steps, I just need to find a suitable location to do so - is a page on the MythTV Wiki appropriate?</div>
<div><br></div><div>If I can't resolve the network performance issues then I have a plan B, It's currently completely untested but I'm thinking of setting up a couple of network tuners on the master backend and using a channel changing script to manipulate an instance of dvblast on the MOI - one for each tuner, the Freesat transponders i'm interested in are advertised as between 30mbits/s and 45mbits/s so multirec might not be an option, but it should manage two simultaneous recordings, without the overheads of running backend over NFS.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The more I think about it the network tuner option sounds better than running a slave backend (one less version of Mythtv to compile etc).</div><span><font color="#888888"><div><br></div>
<div>R.</div></font></span></div><br></div><div dir="ltr" style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">Thank you!<div><br></div><div>I had thoughts on trying to get MythTV 0.26 or a version of your plan B working on mine. I have a combined MythTV FE/BE with Freeview and only want to add the odd few freesat channels to my Mythsystem and the sat feed is remote from the current setup.</div>
<div><br></div><div>My thoughts were exactly the same. I dont compile MythTV but just use the stock Mythbuntu with various mods of my own to integrate remotes/xbmc etc on the same box. Therefore one less version to compile (ie none) is the ideal :-)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Martin</div><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class="im"><br></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Ooops apologies...top posted in error....gmail!</div><div style><br>
</div><div style>Martin </div></div><br></div></div>