<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>>> is there a list of processors that work with VAAPI and "should" be<br>
>> fast enough for typical MythTV use?<br>
><br>
><br>
> Any Sandy or Ivy Bridge processor should work (the specs should say it has<br>
> INTEL HD graphics built in). I am using a Sandy Bridge Celeron G540 (just<br>
> about the slowest sandy bridge processor you can buy today) and it was<br>
> powerful enough for CPU playback... but VAAPI freed up the CPU for<br>
> comflagging and whatnot.<br>
><br>
> In reality, if you have any sort of GPU acceleration (VAAPI, VDPAU, etc)<br>
> there isn't an x86 processor made today that is NOT fast enough. Mythtv<br>
> doesn't use that much CPU unless your doing post processing (commflag,<br>
> transcode, etc).<br>
<br>
</div></div>right, but not all GPU acceleration is made the same, the older cards<br>
were not capable of the support required for typical MythTV file<br>
playback, especially with deinterlacing taken into account.<br>
<br>
It's not the CPU speed I'm concerned with but the GPU<br>
speed/capabilities. If I go and buy a Sandy cpu with "INTEL HD", and<br>
connect it to my 1080p tv can I expect the quality of it's 1080i<br>
playback with deinterlacing to be on par with what I get from my<br>
NVidia GT220 in regards to CPU load reduction?</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Ahh... now that is a completely different question than "<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">is there a list of processors that work with VAAPI and "should" be</span></div>
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div class="im">fast enough for typical MythTV use?"<br><br></div>I doubt that VAAPI would match a GT220 with Advanced 2X deinterlacing. I believe that VAAPI only supports BOB 2X and One Field... I read something that suggests future cores may add additional de-int options?</span></div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Correction... the cores, even some before sandy-bridge, had support for advanced deinterlacing methods... it's all about the intel driver. Apparently they simply haven't enabled the support for advanced deinterlacing in the driver yet, just Bob.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>Regardless, for casual watching the picture looks fine to me. I just put on a 1080i hockey game, and I definitely see some interlace lines around players bodies, and the image isn't as crisp as I would like... but it's watchable. I stand by my comment below.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_quote"><font face="arial, sans-serif">I would say that VAAPI is ideal for secondary frontends... but I will stick to VDPAU for my primary, big, living room TV where quality matters.</font></div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>