On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Saul A. Peebsen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jaglover@gmail.com" target="_blank">jaglover@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:38:39 +0000<br>
Mike Perkins <<a href="mailto:mikep@randomtraveller.org.uk">mikep@randomtraveller.org.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> *Any* connection over WiFi is going to pot luck for any user<br>
> depending on their particular location and setup. I'm almost certain<br>
> that there will be very few people who can get stable, reliable HD<br>
> over WiFi.<br>
<br>
</div>Couldn't agree more. As a former radio engineer I can tell you right<br>
now, wireless is no replacement for wired, it can be an extension at<br>
best.<br>
The rule of thumb:<br>
Wired - convenient to use but needs some effort to set up/build.<br>
Wireless - convenient to set up but endless frustration of use.<br>
Take your pick.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Cheers, Saul<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>I am referring to nominal performance, not really special conditions or setup variables. I have the slower <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11g" title="IEEE 802.11" style="font-size:12.727272033691406px;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(11,0,128);background-image:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:sans-serif;line-height:19.190340042114258px">802.11b/g</a> right now and on a laptop i can nearly play full HD with a pause every 3 seconds or so (so close). Anyone able to do it with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11g" title="IEEE 802.11" style="font-size:12.727272033691406px;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(11,0,128);background-image:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:sans-serif;line-height:19.190340042114258px">802.11</a>n? And if so, sometimes certain hardware cannot peg the wireless I/O and still deliver the rest of the package, which is more around the question specific to the Zotac. </div>
<div><br></div><div>If not, then I can't wait for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11g" title="IEEE 802.11" style="font-size:12.727272033691406px;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(11,0,128);background-image:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:sans-serif;line-height:19.190340042114258px">802.11</a>ad which should be able to do it according to specs.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-MH</div>