<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/02/2013 01:10 PM, Andrew wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADoMTs+L1Y9J-7ZixmA6wv74xYqqJpVKnE7b4asy7=WBC=Sd-Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Saul A. Peebsen <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jaglover@gmail.com" target="_blank">jaglover@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:38:39 +0000<br>
Mike Perkins <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mikep@randomtraveller.org.uk">mikep@randomtraveller.org.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> *Any* connection over WiFi is going to pot luck for any
user<br>
> depending on their particular location and setup. I'm
almost certain<br>
> that there will be very few people who can get stable,
reliable HD<br>
> over WiFi.<br>
<br>
</div>
Couldn't agree more. As a former radio engineer I can tell you
right<br>
now, wireless is no replacement for wired, it can be an
extension at<br>
best.<br>
The rule of thumb:<br>
Wired - convenient to use but needs some effort to set
up/build.<br>
Wireless - convenient to set up but endless frustration of
use.<br>
Take your pick.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Cheers, Saul<br>
</font></span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users"
target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div>I am referring to nominal performance, not really special
conditions or setup variables. I have the slower <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11g"
title="IEEE 802.11"
style="font-size:12.727272033691406px;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(11,0,128);background-image:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:sans-serif;line-height:19.190340042114258px">802.11b/g</a> right
now and on a laptop i can nearly play full HD with a pause every
3 seconds or so (so close). Anyone able to do it with <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11g"
title="IEEE 802.11"
style="font-size:12.727272033691406px;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(11,0,128);background-image:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:sans-serif;line-height:19.190340042114258px">802.11</a>n?
And if so, sometimes certain hardware cannot peg the wireless
I/O and still deliver the rest of the package, which is more
around the question specific to the Zotac. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If not, then I can't wait for <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11g"
title="IEEE 802.11"
style="font-size:12.727272033691406px;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(11,0,128);background-image:none;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:sans-serif;line-height:19.190340042114258px">802.11</a>ad
which should be able to do it according to specs.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-MH</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
I play hd on a mythfront very near flawless using 'n'. but i do it
through a wireless bridge and then hardwire to the bridge. i use
openwrt on everything and atheros chipset based cheap 20 dollar
routers (tp-link). <br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>