<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/2/2013 3:50 PM, Andrew wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADoMTsJg5wy7msAqBRG8PNxSOXHWUQv1VnR=oKhf3dKbMU-Axg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Saul A. Peebsen <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jaglover@gmail.com" target="_blank">jaglover@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 22:00:28 +0000<br>
Mike Perkins <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mikep@randomtraveller.org.uk">mikep@randomtraveller.org.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> >> I play hd on a mythfront very near flawless
using 'n'. but i do it<br>
> >> through a wireless bridge and then hardwire to
the bridge. i use<br>
> >> openwrt on everything and atheros chipset
based cheap 20 dollar<br>
> >> routers (tp-link).<br>
> ><br>
> The point is, you can put in whatever fancy equipment
you can lay<br>
> your hands on but you can't dictate what all the
neighbours around<br>
> you are going to do. If they all have wireless AP's
going full blast<br>
> it doesn't matter what kit /you/ have. You are going to
get crap<br>
> reception.<br>
<br>
</div>
Correct. And even if you are alone and there are no
interfering<br>
neighbors your connection you may still suffer from degraded<br>
connection relevant but not limited to other high-frequency
devices<br>
and even atmospheric conditions which may suppress your signal
with a<br>
remote one in some cases. It's the radio wave, it's
unpredictable.<br>
<br>
OTOH, there was lots of money invested in wireless technology.
Which<br>
means there is strong pressure on unsuspecting customers to
buy them.<br>
It's up to you to follow the knowledge and common sense and go
wired<br>
or ... go wireless and struggle with unpredictable reception.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Cheers, Saul<br>
</font></span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users"
target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div>people....people...people.... Stop!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">It's
not about the neighbors, nor high frequency devices, nor ionic
atmospheric blasts from space, nor selling pressures, nor
Bush's fault... It was simply "can HD run on n?", in which
someone already replied saying "yes" it can but still an
occasional skip. Thanks for that answer and it sounds like
802.11ad will be much faster than "n" and get us to the point
where HD over wifi will work even better in the future. The
obvious is best results are always wired.</span></div>
<div><span
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Thanks
all.</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
Short answer, yes, 802.11n can play HD. Particularly a 2-polarity
radio. I've streamed 16m mpeg2 HDs for many years over multiple 10+
mile links with few issues. And to repeat the others, it's certainly
more prone to issues than a wired link. And don't get your hopes up
too high for 802.11ad<br>
</body>
</html>