<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
> > AFAIK, SATA is all interoperable - the end of each link negotiate for the highest speed they both support and run at that. If the drive does 6Gbps and your controller is limited to 3Gbps, then they will negotiate and run at 3.<br>
> >> > I am considering adding a 2TB WD disk to my system (WD2002FAEX).<br>
> > Then the partitioning problems do not apply. As already mentioned, you should start your partitions at a multiple of 8 'sectors', while fdisk will default to starting at 63. Since I think all large drives now use 4k sectors on the disk, such a mislignment affects performance.<br>
> > -- Simon Hobson<br>
> For what it's worth, I recently replaced my WD 2TB drive with another WD<br>
> 2TB drive (WDC WD2003FYYS-02W0B1) and it has 512 byte sectors. I used<br>
> fdisk to partition it (one partition). The previous 2TB drives that<br>
> this replaced had failed (WD2001FASS-00U0B0 and WD2001FASS-00W2B0).<br>
><br>
> Jay<br>
><br>
</div>AFAIK fdisk does not support GPT partitioning & does not default to<br>
correct alignment. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
The stock disk tools in *buntu 12.04 are not up to the job either.<br>
It is easy enough to build latest stable "gparted" from source on Ubuntu<br>
12.04 & 10.04.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>sudo apt-get install gdisk. No need to build gparted.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
The "idle3-tools" let you increase the idle-head-park on the WD HDD<br>
green drives.<br>
<br>
My incorrectly aligned WD EARX 2TB green (ext4) ran about 30% slower.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>