<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Gary Buhrmaster <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com" target="_blank">gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Nick Rout <<a href="mailto:nick.rout@gmail.com">nick.rout@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
...<br>
<div class="im">> Why would you choose mpeg2 over h.264?<br>
<br>
</div>These days, for new service roll-outs, as Karl pointed out,<br>
there is no compelling reason to do so. However, legacy<br>
issues (equipment or standards) may require MPEG-2<br>
(The US ATSC transmission standard, for example,<br>
specifies MPEG-2).<br></blockquote><div><br>Not according to this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atsc#H.264.2FMPEG-4_AVC">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atsc#H.264.2FMPEG-4_AVC</a> <br></div></div>