<div dir="ltr">I had the same experience as paul. I had been a long-time ATrpms user, but eventually switched over the RPMfusion and been happy.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Brian Long <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:briandlong@gmail.com" target="_blank">briandlong@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Paul Stillwell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bigboi@wackywombats.com" target="_blank">bigboi@wackywombats.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I've noticed that ATrpms seems to be slightly behind rpmfusion in terms of which version of myth they are each offering. ATrpms is at 0.25.3 and I think rpmfusion is at 0.25.6. Does anyone know if either have plans to create a 0.26 package? I'm not complaining because I realize that people have other things to do than create packages. I'm just curious.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Paul,</div><div>I've been a long-time ATrpms user, but I just upgraded my backend and frontends for F17 and used RPMfusion's 0.26 RPMs as well as their Nvidia drivers. I also downloaded RPMfusion's SRPM and rebuilt the RPMs with the latest 0.26-fixes patches applied. It was a piece of cake.</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div><div>/Brian/</div><div><br></div></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>