<p dir="ltr">Wg</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 19 Oct 2012 18:49, "Richard Shaw" <<a href="mailto:hobbes1069@gmail.com">hobbes1069@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Mark <<a href="mailto:markhsa@gmail.com">markhsa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I am running F17, and so far no 26 rpms yet in the testing repos.<br>
> Anyone have access to 26 rpms yet?<br>
<br>
It would probably be better ask this in the RPM Fusion or ATRPMS<br>
mailing lists (since you're asking about RPMs), however, since I<br>
maintain the RPM Fusion ones I'll answer here :)<br>
<br>
I'm trying to be cautious since it (eventually) means updating<br>
everyone's install to 0.26 who uses RPM Fusion. Unfortunately we do<br>
not have a mechanism (like Bodhi on Fedora) to hold packages in<br>
-testing. Since an individual (and not the maintainer) manually moves<br>
packages from testing to stable it's difficult to control when this<br>
happens. Even if I request the packages to stay in testing longer than<br>
normal they may forget and move them anyway, which is what happened<br>
for 0.25->0.25.2.<br>
<br>
I tried browsing through trac for any show stoppers but it wasn't a<br>
very efficient use of my time. I think I'll end up waiting on a signal<br>
from the mailing list saying 0.26 is at least as good (and stable) as<br>
0.25.2, which it may already be. If so, then I'll start working on<br>
packages as soon as I have time.<br>
<br>
Richard<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div>