Hi<br><br>On Sunday, 21 October 2012, Mark Greenwood wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
In the UK, DVB signals include channel numbers, so by 'sensible' I mean 'following the channel order as defined in the signal'. Mythtv appears to ignore this. A rescan on my myth box takes 15 minutes, then I have at least 2 copies of each channel so I have to work out which one is the best for each channel then set a channel number and delete the others. But then because I've set my own channel numbers but myth invents new ones when I rescan (e.g. 4283 for BBC1..huh?) I get loads of duplicates as well. It's a nightmare. It also doesn't take account of the signal strengths of the channels it finds, whereas my TV will choose the best signal for each channel and discard any duplicates, hence I only get one BBC1 and it's on Channel 1, instead of 3 of them randomly distributed across the channels like I get with mythtv. (The first scan, I had BBC1 on channels 1, 46, and 4283. Where did it get those numbers from? The only one that gives a decent picture is the one on 4283 so it sho<br>
uld have chosen that one and thrown the other 2 away).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Myth uses the channel as defined by the DVB stream. It may not be what you're used to, but that's what the broadcast uses.</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
</blockquote><div>In Oz, after a scan, channel 9 is on 9, Seven on 7, Ten on 10 etc..</div><div><br></div><div>The order used by myth is exactly the same as the tuner in my TV would use too <span></span></div>