<div>On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:44 AM, John Pilkington <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:J.Pilk@tesco.net" target="_blank">J.Pilk@tesco.net</a>></span> wrote:</div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 01/08/12 15:51, Yeechang Lee wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
John Pilkington <<a href="mailto:J.Pilk@tesco.net" target="_blank">J.Pilk@tesco.net</a>> says:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
It means the tuner number is greater than 9 - and probably that you<br>
aren't running 0.25. IIRC it wasn't possible to display two-digit<br>
numbers. I don't know why all your tuner numbers are so high.<br>
Maybe you rescanned without deleting them all first?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Not Marco, but in my case on 0.24, three HDHomeRun Prime tuners<br>
(which, in 0.24, appear as tuners 1, 3, and 5, with no way to skip 2,<br>
4, and 6) and two HDHomeRun ATSC tuners with multirec (7-10).<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Fair enough, but Marco said they were /all/ showing the #. My system status at one point showed over 20 tuners, mostly inaccessible. I think the problem there was non-matching hostnames, and IIRC there were only two hardware tuners. Now I see 14; 2 sets of 5, 2 sets of 2 from four hardware tuners on three hardware DVB-T devices.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>I recently rebuilt my machine, and at some point I deleted all the tuners and re-added them. I guess that increased the numbering, since the first tuner is now #12.</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br></div></div></div>