On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Eric Sharkey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eric@lisaneric.org" target="_blank">eric@lisaneric.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Mitchell Gore <<a href="mailto:mitchell.gore@gmail.com">mitchell.gore@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">> (Canceled cable but I<br>
> still get several QAM stations with Internet.)<br>
<br>
</div>Please don't do this. It's for this reason that the cable companies<br>
have been pushing to eliminate clear QAM, which makes it harder for<br>
the rest of us. Just pay for the services you use, it doesn't cost<br>
much for the most basic TV package.<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
<br>
Eric Sharkey<br></blockquote></div><br>I would disagree. Most Cable Co's are trying to encrypt everything so they dont have to roll a truck to activate/de-activate service. Saving them a bunch of $$. It doesnt have anything to do with a few subset of users getting essentially the free OTA stations via a cable feed w/only Internet.<br>
<br>Just my 2 cents.<br><br>Mitchell<br>