<div class="gmail_quote">2012/5/15 Simon Hobson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:linux@thehobsons.co.uk" target="_blank">linux@thehobsons.co.uk</a>></span><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
I transcode stuff for iPad, and I find it runs at either 1/3 or 1/6 of real time - I forget which now. I think it's 1/6 so it takes 6 hours to transcode two 1 hour recordings when running 2 jobs.</blockquote></div></blockquote>
<div> </div><div>I just realized that my requirement for realtime streaming has a name - HLS:-) With the performance you are getting from "normal" transcode I guess it's a no-go:-(</div><div> </div><div>Thanks</div>
</div>