<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Chris Pinkham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cpinkham@bc2va.org" target="_blank">cpinkham@bc2va.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<snip><br>
<br>
The (currently unconfigurable) default is to only use 2 encoding<br>
threads, so you won't be able to max out all cores. Changing this<br>
setting above will use 4 and 6 threads for encoding which should<br>
get higher CPU utilization. HLS support is a work in progress, I have<br>
at least 15-20 things related to HLS on my TODO list. Expect that<br>
some will be in 0.26 and some will have to wait until 0.27 depending<br>
on how much time I have over the next couple months.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Chris<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>As I understand it, the HLS transcode runs on whichever BE holds the recording. Can we get a sneak peak as to the long term plan for HLS? Will it move to the job queue where we can control which BEs run this work?<br>
<br>I ask as currently my MBE is the only box with real horsepower and is the only BE configured to run jobs. My SBEs are diskless, low horsepower machines that aren't meant to do any "real" work. <br><br>
Please know I'm not complaining about HLS, just want to understand the long term plan so I can understand if I need to beef up my SBEs to support HLS.<br><br>Also, is there any feasibility of VDPAU assisted transcode playing a part in HLS in the near or far future? (couldn't resist)<br>
<br>Thanks!<br>Dave<br><br>