<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Nick Rout <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nick.rout@gmail.com">nick.rout@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Gary Buhrmaster<br>
<<a href="mailto:gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com">gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 00:43, Pieter De Wit <<a href="mailto:pieter@insync.za.net">pieter@insync.za.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> ....<br>
>> Hi Simon,<br>
>><br>
>> It had faster ram :) Should have put that in the previous email. The 220<br>
>> will do what you need too :)<br>
>><br>
>> I wanted to do 1080, with HDMI audio, both the 430 and the 450 "handles"<br>
>> it on paper. I can assure you the 450 does. I would not doubt the 430<br>
>> can do it.<br>
><br>
> In 50Hz countries, for deinterlacing, the 430 has been reported<br>
> to have enough headroom to work well. In 60Hz countries, the<br>
> 430 has been reported to not always be capable of glitch-free<br>
> display when doing deinterlacing. The 220 is an older design,<br>
> and while it cannot do HDMI audio,<br>
<br>
</div>I believe it can actually.<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
> it is a far more capable<br>
> card for deinterlacing (more than fast enough for all countries).<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There is audio over HDMI and there's HD Audio Codecs over HDMI. If I remember correctly, the 2xx series could do _some_ HD Audio codecs, but not the full suite of them. I don't think it could do DTS Master HD. I think it could do Dolby TrueHD. But I'm not certain. </div>
</div>