<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:17 PM, jedi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jedi@mishnet.org">jedi@mishnet.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT:#ccc 1px solid;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;PADDING-LEFT:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:40:32PM -0800, jk90090 wrote:<br>> On 2/16/12 1:32 PM, Tom Lichti wrote:<br>> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:25 PM, jedi<<a href="mailto:jedi@mishnet.org">jedi@mishnet.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>> > Yes, and the forum posts are interesting as well. Lots of MythTV<br>> > bashing, but nothing really constructive. This is a gem:<br>> ><br>> > "I've been running MythTV for 5+ years now, and frankly, it hasn't<br>
> > changed much. "<br>> ><br>> > Seriously? I've been running it for much longer than that (almost 8<br>> > years) and if you can't see that it's changed, you are missing<br>> > something. Glasses perhaps.<br>
> ><br>> > For something truly 'old fashioned', try your local cable co's PVR offering...<br>> ><br>> The competition isn't the local cable co PVR, it's Tivo, Windows Media<br>> Center, and other good software based PVRs. I agree that MythTV hasn't<br>
<br></div> ...which continue to lag behind MythTV in some areas despite it's<br>apparent stagnation. If someone wants to tackle something comparable to<br>"Internet TV" in MCE, then I'm all for that. Although something like that<br>
doesn't really require a fork of MythTV. Something like that could even be<br>handled by a separate app that's just launched from the usual XML menus.<br></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I agree. But that's just me, of course.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I don't think I've seen any of the dev's officially speak to why there was a fork in the first place. Anyone care to comment?</div></div>