<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Dan Wilga <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mythtv-users2@dwilga-linux1.amherst.edu">mythtv-users2@dwilga-linux1.amherst.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 7/29/11 11:44 AM, David Watkins wrote:<br>
> Maybe it's more like *some* people wouldn't notice a video lag of<br>
> 80ms. The point I was trying to make was that video lagging is<br>
> generally much more noticeable that video leading.<br>
><br>
> Values I've seen quoted as acceptable are 10-15ms for audio leading<br>
> video and 20-45ms for video leading audio. But as you say, it varies.<br>
><br>
</div>It also varies depending on the content. If you're watching a home<br>
improvement show, and a hammer hits the nail before the sound comes out,<br>
it's pretty noticeable. The same is also true for live music,<br>
particularly when it comes to the drummer.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm trying 180ms for all material, and so far it seems OK. I haven't heard any complaints from the lady. I can see a slight difference, but I'm also picky. Thanks!</div>
<div><br></div><div>Jim</div></div>