<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Richard Morton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.e.morton@gmail.com">richard.e.morton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 12 February 2011 19:36, Richard Morton <<a href="mailto:richard.e.morton@gmail.com">richard.e.morton@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi James,<br>
><br>
> I was wondering on your progress of this piece of work (decoding the<br>
> Sky EPG information).?<br>
><br>
> Also is there more accurate information in the data compared to the<br>
> variable description information broadcast by the various channels<br>
> showing the same show (or even the same network changing the<br>
> description slightly such as stating "also in HD" so the recording is<br>
> recorded twice); both SD and HD or each time they repeat the series<br>
> 'cause they have tweaked or completely changed the description?<br>
><br>
> Thanks - sounds very promising, I hope this will be able to be merged<br>
> into Myth and be supported as a EIT replacement, rather than simply as<br>
> an XML grabber. Either way, thanks for your hard work.<br>
><br>
> R<br>
<br>
</div>I forgot to say that if the sky epg information is more consistent and<br>
reliable then it maybe nice to be able to use this information for any<br>
broadcast of the same channel; i.e. freeview and freesat in the uk;<br>
but still permitting the freesat eit information when the sky<br>
information isnt available.<br></blockquote><div><br>Have you looked for the previous work done in this area.<br><br>epgsnoop, etc. <br></div></div>