On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Raymond Wagner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raymond@wagnerrp.com">raymond@wagnerrp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 11/17/2010 15:51, Eric Sharkey wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Robert McNamara<br>
<<a href="mailto:robert.mcnamara@gmail.com" target="_blank">robert.mcnamara@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes, that's what he means, no, it does not bypass HDCP. It respects<br>
it entirely. You will get nothing from a consumer cable set top box.<br>
</blockquote>
Do STB's always use HDCP when using HDMI or would it at least<br></div>
sometimes be disabled?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Always.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div>The problem with HDMI capture is the size of the stream. I know of no HDMI capture device which will compress (h264?) the stream and real-time compression on the CPU would be rather difficult.</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Mark. </div></div>