<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Mike McMullin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mwmcmlln@mnsi.net">mwmcmlln@mnsi.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 22:35 -0400, Matt Emmott wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Mark Boyum <<a href="mailto:mark@boyum.us">mark@boyum.us</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Not sure how that happened. I just checked my slave backend<br>
> and it's running<br>
> > the same version. My myth install generally goes like this:<br>
> ><br>
> > Install Ubuntu<br>
> > Install mythbuntu-control-centre<br>
> > Configure roles in mythbuntu-control-centre<br>
> ><br>
> > Both boxes report Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS \n \l in /etc/issue and<br>
> my<br>
> > /etc/apt/sources.list doesn't contain anything whacky that I<br>
> can see:<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> <--Snip--><br>
><br>
> > So how the heck did I fork?<br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
> If I remember correctly, Ubuntu 10.04 was released shortly<br>
> before the<br>
> 0.23 release. So it would make sense if you are using the<br>
> version of<br>
> Myth in the 10.04 repos.<br>
> -Mark<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Ok, I'm thoroughly confused.I suppose I could be ok that it's running<br>
> older libraries or something since, as you said, 10.04 was out before<br>
> 0.23, but why the heck would the version show up as 0.23 if it's not a<br>
> true 0.23? To take this a step further, are you saying that when I<br>
> upgrade my systems to 10.10, it will bring Myth to 0.23.1, but when<br>
> 0.24 comes out I'll remain at 0.23.1 but the version number listed in<br>
> my logs will change to 0.24?<br>
><br>
> I think my brain just exploded.<br>
<br></div></div></blockquote><div>I've updated both backends and three of my five frontends to 10.10 and am now running build 26437.When .24 comes out I'll point my repos to the autobuilds and see what happens.Thanks for the help, this was quite an informative thread. </div>
</div>