<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Brian Wood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:beww@beww.org">beww@beww.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Tuesday, September 14, 2010 01:53:56 pm Marco Nelissen wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Brian Wood <<a href="mailto:beww@beww.org">beww@beww.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> (...)<br>
><br>
> > But it makes me very uneasy to take advantage of all these "free"<br>
> > services, anything "free" usually turns out to be worth<br>
> > the cost, or to actually cost much more in the end.<br>
><br>
> Kinda funny reading that on a mailinglist meant for discussing a free<br>
> software product :)<br>
<br>
</div></div>That thought occurred to me as well.<br>
<br>
But we are talking about two different kinds of freedom. Myth would remain "free" even if it cost money to buy it (as long<br>
as it was still GPL).<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sure, but the fact of the matter is that in addition to being free in the GPL sense, it is also "free as in beer"/gratis, and therefore, according to what you said earlier, either is worthless, or has some hidden cost that we should all be wary of.</div>
<div><br></div></div>