<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Jarod Wilson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jarod@wilsonet.com">jarod@wilsonet.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Some of the headless windows home server boxes are a semi-interesting</div></div>
as well. Not likely as low-power, but with atom procs, reasonably low<br>
power and a more mainstream distro, and thus easier to get current<br>
software for (and/or build on another host).<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859105777" target="_blank">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859105777</a><br>
<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859321013" target="_blank">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859321013</a><br>
<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859110001" target="_blank">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859110001</a><br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You evil genius :) I hadn't even thought of these, but that does seem to fill a niche. As long as you don't need the high power for commercial detection or for transcoding, I bet these little boxes would make a fine backend if the correct types of tuners are used. </div>
</div>