<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Scott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:list-mythtv@bluecamel.eml.cc">list-mythtv@bluecamel.eml.cc</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br></div>
As I understand it, with storage groups I would be able to simplify my setup by NFS mounting the videos on the BE then using storage groups with the BE and FE. I would not have to share directories for artwork.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Exactly right, simplicity of use and transparency to the user/administrator in adding more content, backends. etc. has always been the major winning point of converting things to Storage groups for me.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Simplification is always good. :)<br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We agree. Wait until you see what we have in store for >= .25 ;)</div><div><br></div><div>
Robert</div></div>