<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Eric Sharkey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eric@lisaneric.org">eric@lisaneric.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">In this context, the word "display" does not mean "render on a screen"</div>
but rather to "publicly exhibit", or put on display. There is no<br>
difference here between MythWeather and Firefox. The difference is<br>
public display vs. private viewing. They're saying public displays of<br>
the data are forbidden (without further licensing).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Says you. I'm sorry, I am not a lawyer, and don't wish to be one. However, I am not debating the interpretation of their TOS. As you are not the person on the hook for this, it is easy for you to posture how you will. I don't have that luxury. I don't need the potential of cease & desist notices, etc. In my reading, and that of several others, we were at *best* in the grey area, and at worst, flagrantly violating their TOS. I chose to err on the side of caution and remove it and remove all doubt.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As I said... be patient. I should have a replacement in place fairly soon.</div></div>