On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Robert Parker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:theparkers.mailbox@gmail.com">theparkers.mailbox@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Thanks to everyone who helped out. The most promising one I found was from<br><font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica" color="black" size="2"><font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica" color="black" size="2"><br><a href="http://www.dfm.uninsubria.it/compiz/fusion-testing/flashplayer.x86_64/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.dfm.uninsubria.it/compiz/fusion-testing/flashplayer.x86_64/</a><br>
<br>as reported in that gossamer thread. Firefox shows it as "10.0 r45".<br><br>There is also a 10.0 r22 available from bittorrent<br><a href="http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5621825/64-bit_Flash_Player_for_Linux" target="_blank">http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5621825/64-bit_Flash_Player_for_Linux</a></font></font></blockquote>
<div><br>Since 10.1 32-bit was released and I wanted the security fixes, I followed these instructions to use the 32-bit 10.1 on my 64-bit Fedora:<br><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash</a><br>
<br>If you stick with 10.x 64-bit, you're open to some fairly significant security holes.<br><br>/Brian/<br></div></div><br>