<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/1/25 ryan patterson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ryan.goat@gmail.com">ryan.goat@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:16 PM, jedi <<a href="mailto:jedi@mishnet.org">jedi@mishnet.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:00:45PM -0500, Michael T. Dean wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">>> some people have put their heart and soul (and a /lot/ of time)<br>
>> into making it (and, no, time you spend setting it up doesn't count<br>
><br>
> ...and in some cases breaking it.<br>
><br>
> This isn't something that should just be casually dismissed with all of<br>
> the usual "send us patches" nonsense rhetoric.<br>
<br>
</div>The original poster hosed his own system by leaving remnants of his<br>
manually compiled copy of myth in place (possibly NOT under<br>
/usr/local) then installing the package maintained copy on top of it.<br>
I don't see how you can blame the developers in this case.<br></blockquote><div><br>Now that is slander;). I said I had compiled from source but that was years ago. I am not sure if it was even on the same install. I have done at least 3 apt-get package based updates since then. I think it may be a corrupt package database. See my previous post.<br>
<br>Regards,<br>Ben (the original poster)<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>