This is just my two cents here, but in a switched network, subnetting will not help with actual traffic. You are still pushing the same amount of data through the same ports. You might be thinking of using VLANs (Virtual LANs), but that is overkill and you probably won't notice any difference.<br>
<br>If it were me, I would leave everything on the same subnet just to keep things separate. If you need more addresses or something, just change your subnetting to allow more addresses.<br><br>If anyone thinks I'm wrong or has another opinion, please chime in and let me know.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Aaron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aaron@rb303.net">aaron@rb303.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
It could probably be done depending on if you can tell Myth which NIC<br>
to listen on. The second subnet would need it's own DHCP server, or<br>
preferably just use static IP's since only a hand full of items will<br>
be on that network.<br>
<br>
Other than that it's a bit of overkill IMO.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
mythtv-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>