<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Robert McNamara <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert.mcnamara@gmail.com">robert.mcnamara@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Mike,<div class="im"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Mike LaPlante <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@dividia.net" target="_blank">mike@dividia.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Should my schema have changed since this wasn't a major release update just a fixes version?</blockquote></div><br></div><div>No. Schema and protocol will never change in official copies of -fixes. It's one of the "guarantees" in staying with the stable branch. Using alternate or unofficial sources of patches or packages may break or alter the schema, however, YMMV. If these are all from mythbuntu repositories, you are fine.</div>
</blockquote><div><br>Is this actaully true?<br><br>Wasn't there a protocol change from 30 to 31 in the .20 fixes branch? There was also a fairly major schema change to do with mythmusic, which resulted in the upnp media server serving music files from an old table structure (and thus never updating)...<br>
</div></div><br>