<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jyavenard@gmail.com">jyavenard@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Hi<br><br>Using the vdpau test tool posted on the nvidia forums, this is what I got:<br><br>9500GT:<br>MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 567 frames/s<br>
MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 1086 fields/s<br>MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 218 fields/s<br>MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 74 fields/s<br><br>8600GT:<br>MIXER WEAVE (1920x1080): 474 frames/s<br>MIXER BOB (1920x1080): 834 fields/s<br>
MIXER TEMPORAL (1920x1080): 175 fields/s<br>MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL (1920x1080): 69 fields/s<br><br>So a 9500GT is a tad faster, but when it comes to the media you will<br>ever come across, either will do just as well: they are both fast<br>
enough<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"> </div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Well, I bought a 9500GT this afternoon. We'll see how it does. Thanks for the info.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>-Greg</div></div><br>