<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Glen Dragon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gdragon@jetcom.org">gdragon@jetcom.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Okay... Here's what i played with tonight... <br><ul><li>HDMI video works. Not surprising.</li><li>I got HDMI audio to work for the analog stuff. AAC in this case. Couldn't figure out why ac-3 did not pass through as would be expected. I'm sure it can be made to work.. i just don't have the need/use case, since my receiver doesn't have hdmi switching.. and it seems silly to pipe the audio into the tv, just to pipe it back out. </li>
</ul></div></div></blockquote><div>Just to clarify in my head, you passed HDMI audio directly to your receiver from your analog content? <br><br>As as as piping audio through the TV back to the receiver... that would actually be my use case. My TV has 3 HDMI inputs, and is connected optically to my receiver. All content gets fed through the TV. My audio system is actually a Sony 5-disc DVD changer, which only has two digital audio inputs, 1 optical (from the TV) and 1 unused coaxial. It connects to the TV with HDMI. So in my case, it wouldn't be silly.<br>
</div><div><br>I'm curious as to how the single core and NV 9400 will do de-interlacing 1080i content. I understand that Advance 2X doesn't work with the 9400... will 1X be good enough?<br><br>I'd also be very interested if anyone picks up the dual-core version of this thing to understand the noise .<br>
<br></div></div><br>