<html><body>
<p><tt>-----Jeremy Enos wrote: -----<br>
</tt><br>
<tt>>Hi-<br>
</tt><tt>>Just updated to .21 and am getting a much increased channel change<br>
</tt><tt>>delay<br>
</tt><tt>>relative to .20 which was already too slow. It's taking 15 to 25<br>
</tt><tt>>seconds to lock, and then the normal 3-5 seconds or so after that to<br>
</tt><tt>>actually play. Anyone else seeing delays like this?<br>
</tt><tt>>thx-<br>
</tt><tt>><br>
</tt><tt>> Jeremy<br>
</tt><tt>><br>
</tt><tt>><Disclaimer><br>
</tt><tt>>Before a dozen developers jump this question w/ unconstructive "why<br>
</tt><tt>>watch livetv?" discussion, let me provide some information:<br>
</tt><tt>>* I have checked and read previous threads.<br>
</tt><tt>>* This is slow channel change, but I don't think the typical buffer<br>
</tt><tt>>delay- this is slow to lock (dvb-s), and it's different in .21 than<br>
</tt><tt>> it<br>
</tt><tt>>was with.20.<br>
</tt><tt>>* LiveTV channel change performance does in fact, matter, even if<br>
</tt><tt>>you<br>
</tt><tt>>personally don't use it. That is, if you're at all interested in<br>
</tt><tt>>MythTV<br>
</tt><tt>>maintaining popularity in a rapidly filling market of competing<br>
</tt><tt>>software<br>
</tt><tt>>or integrated devices that accomplish the same technical hurdles for<br>
</tt><tt>>LiveTV, but do it better. I still choose MythTV for a variety of<br>
</tt><tt>>other<br>
</tt><tt>>reasons, so of course I'd like to see MythTV dominate the competition<br>
</tt><tt>>on<br>
</tt><tt>>all fronts. (sorry- I've just seen many other threads degrade to an<br>
</tt><tt>>"I<br>
</tt><tt>>don't need it, so you shouldn't need it either" type of discussion)<br>
</tt><tt>></Disclaimer><br>
</tt><tt>><br>
</tt><br>
<tt>I have two Hauppauge HVR-4000 where I use the DVB-S part running with .21 and the channel change takes about 6-7 seconds. With Kaffeine this takes 1-2 seconds. The difference only being the 5 seconds MythTV is buffering.</tt></body></html>