<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Paul Gardiner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@glidos.net">lists@glidos.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Jeppe Madsen wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I recently changed from using a single antenna to two antennas combined using a triax reverse splitter with f-connectors. This increased the signal quality as reported by myth from about 59% to 70% but I still see a lot of errors....I believe i have turned on lna (see previous posts).<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
70% a typical value I get here, and almost never see decoding errors. I<br>
think you are correct that you have the lna working, otherwise you'd<br>
get nowhere near 70%. Could your hard drive be faulty?<br><font color="#888888">
</font></blockquote><div><br>Don't know about the physical harddrive, how to tell? But I run this<br>under Xen which may impact the performance. I'm recording directly to<br>an lvm device though, not a filebased virtual disk.<br>
<br>Would harddrive defects, bad harddrive performance etc. show as mpeg<br>decoding errors in the logs? If so, any suggestions as to identify<br>the cause?<br><br>/Jeppe<br> </div></div><br>