<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Raymond Wagner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:raymond@wagnerrp.com">raymond@wagnerrp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Nick F wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
My Atom 330 with a PCI 8400GS running 0.21 fixes with Jean-Yves's patches makes for a great frontend.<br>
</blockquote></div>
Jean's patches are not a release version of MythTV.<div class="im"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
It plays Blu-Ray rips (of disks I own!) through the 100mbit network connection<br>
</blockquote></div>
As Robert explained, I wasn't saying you can't do it, but that you can't use jumbo frames if you want to use this device. You cannot use two different frame sizes on the same logical network. You can use the same physical network and switches, but you have to set up a machine on the network as a router, to route data between the two logical networks.<div>
<div></div><div class="h5"><br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>Could you use a layer 3 switch and set up a couple VLANs? What's so great about jumbo frames that it would make revamping one's network worthwhile? <br></div></div><br>