<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Oct 15, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Matt Emmott wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Kevin Kuphal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kkuphal@gmail.com">kkuphal@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><br><div><br>One word: slingbox<br><br>You're using the wrong technology to solve this problem<br><br>Kevin</div></div><br></div> </blockquote><div><br>If and when the Flash streaming portion of MythWeb matures, it can be better than the Slingbox. I've watched shows on my home PC from work using MythWeb a few times although it is a bit buggy.<br> </div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>I tried using that first and while it might be cool when it does turn into an actual feature (beyond proof of concept*) I really like slingbox's ability to adapt resolution based on available bandwidth and allowing you to favor video or audio depending on what you're watching (talking heads? give audio preference. sports? give video preference)</div><div><br></div><div>-Brad</div><div><br></div><div>*Note: I wish the flash proof of concept sucked more than it does so it would prompt more work on it instead of "this is good enough to live with so this feature drops down in the priority list".</div></body></html>