<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
Brad DerManouelian wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:00E8DD81-81DA-4E7D-A7EE-AB739A1AE8FC@dermanouelian.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:13 PM, steve wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Brad DerManouelian wrote:
|
| If you still insist on getting something to capture cable, go for
the
| HD HomeRun. It will have the fewest issues. It's an external box
that
| doesn't require a PCI slot and you don't have to load special kernel
| drivers to get it to work.
|
| -Brad
|
keep in mind though the hd homerun can only tune unencrypted channels
from cable. In my area of ny (TW) I get 5 channels.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Just like any other QAM tuning device. Not to mention all the other
issues that are constantly discussed on this list and why the "Which
card should I get to capture cable?" is such a loaded question.
If I had it my way, I would cancel everyone's cable in America until
they stopped trying to make people steal what they're paying for.
://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
</pre>
</blockquote>
What is a QAM?<br>
<br>
These guys say their card works in Linux. It also has *4* ports. It
can watch 4 channels at one time!<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://store.bluecherry.net/4_port_video_capture_card_linux_bt878_p/pv-143na_oem.htm">http://store.bluecherry.net/4_port_video_capture_card_linux_bt878_p/pv-143na_oem.htm</a><br>
Is this a good card?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>