I recently put together a new system for use as a general purpose workstation (web, email, office documents, etc.), running XP in a VM (VirtualBox), and also as a Myth front-end. I started out running Fedora 8 on the system, but quickly upgraded to Fedora 9 when it came out. Since the upgrade I've run into a lot of issues (poor performance, limited nVidia drivers, etc.). I want to dual boot to another Linux distro just to try things out for comparison purposes, but might stick to the new distro for a while, depending on how long it takes for things to clear up on the Fedora end. My leading contender for an alternate distro is Ubuntu 8.04, or some derivitate thereof. Let's assume for the sake of argument here that I'll be using this distro for the same things I described for the Fedora system and that I'll be using this distro for a while. My question is would I be better off starting with Mythbuntu and then adding things on from there, or starting with (K)Ubuntu and adding Myth on top of that? Is is six of one or half dozen of another? I use KDE on basically all my desktops, and while I run XFCE on my eeePC and like it, I have a feeling I'll be going to KDE at some point on this new distro. <br>
<br>