<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Marc Sherman <<a href="mailto:msherman@projectile.ca">msherman@projectile.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Jens Baumeister wrote:<br>><br>> Besides, I really don't understand why you would intentionally prefer<br>
> to run an unstable, buggy alpha version instead of the stable branch.<br>> With 0.21 just having been released, there's absolutely no advantage<br>> in running trunk as compare to fixes. (Later in 0.22's development<br>
> cycle, lost of people will chose to switch to SVN to get the latest<br>> and greatest features, but now's not a time for that. Currently tunk<br>> is the in ugly state of being torn apart to install new functionality<br>
> - not a pretty picture.)<br><br>Argh! I _really_ want to be using the feature implemented in 16559[0],<br>but trunk is verboten. Any chance it could get applied to -fixes so that<br>us mere mortals could use it?</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>-fixes, by definition, does not include -features</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Also, if you really want it, download the source for -fixes, apply the patches, adjust anything that might need adjusting and go. Also, I'm running this version of trunk which is prior to the QT4 checking with that feature so...</div>
<div> </div>
<div><caveat></div>
<div>You should be able to check out trunk using the -r switch and grab the revision just before the QT4 changes went in and you should have this new feature without all the instability</div>
<div></caveat></div>
<div> </div>
<div>You've been warned</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kevin</div></div>