<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Marc Sherman <<a href="mailto:msherman@projectile.ca">msherman@projectile.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Todd Ignasiak wrote:<br>><br>> I agree. This change seems to be representative of MythTV in<br>> general. On one hand, it's great.. you have the flexibility to do<br>> whatever you want. On the other hand, why the hell should I have to<br>
> figure out the intricacies of the various settings, decipher the<br>> acronyms, and determine which ones actually apply to my system, to get<br>> the basic functionality working. If there was some basic<br>
> documentation, it might be more reasonable. But, as it is now, it's<br>> very difficult to figure it out.<br>><br>> Some basic improvements:<br>> - Anything this complex NEEDS to be well documented.<br>
<br></div>Wow, you sound like you are very unhappy with the product you received.<br>I suggest that you ask your vendor for a full refund of the purchase price.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Please. We all are here because we like the product. And the OP point is valid. MythTV lacks documentation. It has alot but in this area it is also lagging. Of course, I think the Wiki is the perfect place for all those users who are looking for a place to contribute to start. MythTV needs more than coders, it needs people to document *working* configurations in simple terms for people to use. These can best come from the user community, not just the developers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kevin</div></div>