<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">> The first sentence of the use case seems to suggest soft padding rather than<br>
> hard padding. But if I set two back-to-back programmes like that without the<br>
> hard padding, there will be no overlap between the recordings. Is the wiki<br>
> describing it wrong?<br>
<br>
</div>The wiki describes a possible use-case, not the committed<br>
implementation in 0.21. The documentation needs to be updated (the<br>
wiki makes this clear at the start of the use-case section) to<br>
accurately reflect the behaviour in the 0.21 release.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>OK, yes, I thought documentation was written before the implementation, but the way the documentation describes seems to be easier than the having to set the hard padding. It seems illogical to ignore the soft padding settings when they could be obeyed using a spare virtual tuner.<br>
<br>Never mind, it appears the only way of ensuring back-to-back recordings don't miss either the end of the first or the start of the second recording is to manually intervene and cause a conflict.<br><br>Thanks,<br>
<br>Jonny<br></div></div><br>