<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">One of the joys of multirec is that you will get the overlap in both<br>
recordings. No need to use a second tuner for that situation any more.</blockquote><div><br>But I'm not getting an overlap, if I
record two consecutive programs, the first recording stops a couple of
seconds before the second recording starts. This is exactly what would
happen if I only had one card in the days before multirec. The only way
I can cause the overlap you describe is by manually setting a hard
overlap by adjusting the before/after time on the recording rules. Is
this the expected behaviour? I don't see why the first program should
stop early because I've got another virtual tuner.<br>
<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">The sad part of hard-padding. You're causing a scheduling conflict by<br>
forcing the early/late record times. Let the scheduler do it with soft<br>
padding like you set it up originally.</blockquote><div><br>But it doesn't give any sort of overlap unless I use hard-padding, and cause the recording to shift to another virtual tuner (same physical card on the same multiplex).<br>
<br>Thanks,<br><br>Jonny </div></div><br>