<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Speaking of security cameras, I just saw the ATM cam photos of a<br>
suspect in another murder case.<br>
<br>
How come we can get beautiful pictures of faraway galaxies, the<br>
surface of Mars and satellite photos that allow you to check on your<br>
cat, yet the banks don't seem to be able to afford anything that will<br>
produce a photo that would allow you to recognize an elephant at 6 feet?<br>
<br>
Of course I suspect the photos released to the public have been<br>
intentionally degraded, even when they are asking "do you recognize<br>
this person?". Recognize them? I'm hard put to identify most of those<br>
pics as homo sapiens.<br>
<br>
beww<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>I would say they are low quality because they are trying to smash as much recording time as possible on the recording media (be it digital or analog) they want to keep the longest backlog possible with the least amount of $$$. What you end up with is a low quality video that "does the job"<br>
<br>Mitchell<br></div></div>