<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
I'm just saying that the farther away something is the more likely you<br>
are to have problems accessing it. I like IMAP because the mail is<br>
stored on the server, not my local machine, and POP has problems if<br>
you access from more than one client.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>I don't know that even we disagree about anything here, but I like gmail because the *client* stays on the server, as well as the email. <br><br>As for POP, I was suggesting that one could run a POP client (leave mail on server), but not use it as their regular mail client, for the sole purpose of accessing email archives in the absence of an internet connection. <br>
<br>-chris<br> </div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>TV/IT Engineer<br>WCJB-TV Gainesville, FL<br>(352) 416 0648<br><a href="mailto:cribe@wcjb.com">cribe@wcjb.com</a>