On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Andy Burns <<a href="mailto:fedora@adslpipe.co.uk">fedora@adslpipe.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
</div>Are the mythtv-bleeding builds from the trunk, or the 0.21-fixes tree?<br>
<br>
Just wondering when's a good time to hop-off from bleeding?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>I've also wondered the same thing. My brief an only semi-educated look into this says they are still from the trunk. My reasons? <a href="http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/mythtv/">http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/mythtv/</a> still has "trunk" in the file names for all the packages. It also references r16131 (<a href="http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/changeset/16131/">http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/changeset/16131/</a>) as the version it's compiled from, which is a trunk patch.<br>
<br>I've thought about doing some of the "last minute" testing and going over to bleeding with the intention of transitioning back to stable once 0.21 is released, but haven't done too much more than thinking :)<br>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://jacob.steenhagen.us">http://jacob.steenhagen.us</a>